Mind ProgrammingChoices and IllusionsHome
Home Eldon's Blog
February 2012
S M T W T F S
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3

Upcoming Events

Tue Feb 07 @11:00 - 12:00PM PST
Provocative Enlightenment Radio Show
Eldon Taylor's Blog

Welcome to Eldon Taylor's Blog
Eldon was awarded the 2005 International Peace Prize by The International Cultural Convention sitting in the United States for his work teaching self-responsibility. Eldon's books, tapes, lectures, radio & television appearances for over twenty years have approached personal empowerment from the cornerstones of forgiveness, gratitude and respect for all life. Eldon was a practicing criminalist for over ten years while completing his ministerial education. He supervised and conducted investigations, recovery and detection of deception testing. His earliest work with subliminal information processing was conducted from this setting, including a double blind study conducted at the Utah State Prison in and published in his book Subliminal Communication. He has made a life long study of the human mind and has earned doctoral distinctions in psychology and hypnotherapy. He is a certified psychotherapist and a Fellow with the American Psychotherapy Association (APA) and a certified hypnotherapist with the American Guild of Hypnotherapists. At present, he is the President and Director of Progressive Awareness Research, Inc.

Note: Registration and login required for comment submissions



Violence and Video Gaming E-mail
It’s the gift-giving season and most of us have someone on our list that would like a video game or a DVD or a game player of some kind including perhaps membership to a MMORPG (massive multiplayer online role playing game). I would encourage you to think about fulfilling that gift before you do so. Let me provide some reasons why I think it is worth withholding some gifts, especially for young people, but first allow me to set it up with a short history of video games and violent media.
 
In 1972 the first video entertainment game of kind stormed onto the scene and most of us, who are old enough to remember it, played it—Pong. Two players used video paddles to hit the ball back and forth much like a ping-pong game would be played. In the late ‘80’s and early ‘90s one on one fighting games arrived on the scene. Among them was the game Mortal Combat. This game raised the violence bar. In 1992 the game Wolfenstein was the first major 3D first person shooter and the effect of this game was to place the player in the game fighting, killing and being killed. The realism in Wolfenstein rose to a new level as well with enemies falling and bleeding on the floor. This provoked a revolution in games.
In 1993 the game Doom arrived including much blood and gore and allowing players to hunt and kill each other. As the technical and graphical capability increased, the games became more and more graphic and real. Today games of this nature, such as Soldier of Fortune, “respond realistically to different shots depending on where in the body they are shot, with what weapons and from what distance.” (Anderson 2006)
 
Okay, most have the wrong idea of who plays games for the average gamer is not some teenager. No, it’s actually a 35 year-old overweight man who is aggressive, introverted and often depressed according to the Centers for Disease Control. Many also believe that war games honor our veterans and yet the veterans themselves say the opposite. In a conversation recently with radio host Jason Spiess, he pointed out that when he asked veterans on Veterans Day, “How do we honor you?” The nearly unanimous answer was, “Find ways to resolve conflict peacefully.” They went on to point out that war games dishonor their service because they not only tend to glamorize the matter but to distort the reality of it all. Indeed, the proposed new game, Six Days in Fallujah has met with public opposition by veteran groups for precisely these reasons.
 
Now to some facts I want you to consider. First person shooter games have been linked to an increase in hostile aggressive behavior and a reduction in prosocial behaviors such as charitable giving, volunteer work, and overall helping behaviors. “Video games account for one-third of the average monthly core entertainment spending in the U. S. 45% of the heavy video game players and nearly a third of the avid gamers are in the 6 to 17 year old age group.” (MediaWise.org 2009)
 
Further, when men were assigned to play “Grand Theft Auto” their blood pressure increased and they reported more permissive attitudes toward drugs and alcohol and uncooperative behavior. {Ibid}
 
Adolescents who play more than one hour a day manifest more intense symptoms of ADHD. Game usage has been linked to lower performance or scores on SAT tests and grade point averages. “Those who play MMORPGs report more hours spent playing, worse health, worse sleep quality, and greater interference in ‘real-life socializing and academic work verses those playing other types of video games.” {Ibid}
 
PET scans show that when young men played a video game in which they moved a tank around through a battlefield to destroy the enemy that the neurotransmitter dopamine was released in the brain. Dopamine is involved with feelings of reward and was released from the men’s brain striatum as the men played. “This and other studies suggest that the release of dopamine and stress hormones may be related not only to ideas of violence and harm, but also to motivation.” (Gentile 2009)
 
Still other studies employing eMRI have shown us exactly what areas of the brain are involved when playing violent video games. Researchers have found that immediately before firing a weapon, players displayed greater activity in the dorsal anterior cingulated cortex. This area controls cognitive control and planning among other functions. While firing a weapon and shortly afterward, players showed less activity in the rostral anterior cingulated cortex and amygdala. Because interaction between these brain areas is associated with resolving emotional conflict, their decreased functioning could indicate a suppression of the emotional response to witnessing the results of taking violent action.” {Ibid}
 
This kind of desensitization leads to a systematic desensitization and that leads to a general numbing of empathy to say nothing of the direct correlation with the increase in hostile aggressive behavior. Add this to the television and entertainment that is often consumed and by the time you have a young adult, they have seen over 200,000 commercials and over 30,000 homicides. (Taylor 2009)
 
The fact is, well over 1000 studies including reports from the National Institutes of Health and the U. S. Surgeon General’s office suggest overwhelmingly that there is a definite causal connection between media violence and aggressive behavior in some. I think of it this way, take young people and put them in simulators designed to teach them to kill without emotion. Show them all the blood and gore and reward them for a successful kill. Add greater and greater rewards to enhance their killing ability. Soon, you have trained killers free of the guilt, the remorse or the nagging conscience. We train pilots in flight simulators and some of our enemies train in flight simulators and carry out their missions as a result--what on earth do we think we are doing to our younger generation?
 
Okay, I covered much of this in my books Mind Programming and Choices and Illusions, but then not all of you have read them yet. As such, I did want to remind you of the long-term possible ramifications to satisfying someone’s idea of fun with a violent video game.
 
I do want to wish all of you a wonderful Holiday Season!
 
Thanks for the read, Eldon

 
Programmed or Enlightened Consciousness E-mail
Recently I had Neale Donald Walsch, author of CONVERSATIONS WITH GOD, on my radio show and our conversation continues to generate a flurry of email. Neale essentially stated that there were no virtues that could be said to be universal. Indeed, he asserted that values were relative--an argument for cultural relativity. I had a problem with that statement. For me, there is no evolution of consciousness--single cell to man, monkey to man, Cro-Magnon to homo sapien-sapien or whatever--without the recognition of the value in our sense of service to one another, our noetic knowledge that some things are just inherently wrong, and our realization that there are causes, purposes, meanings and so forth that are larger than the individual. The study of values is called axiology. Metaphysics is all about ontology (being) and axiology (values) or the fundamental nature of reality. Philosophers have longed labored over values, absolute to relative. Immanuel Kant, best know for his CRITIQUE ON PURE REASON, reasoned that value systems derive from tradition, religion, and so forth could not necessarily be relied upon, for in his view there was nothing that was unconditionally good except "good will" and therefore he insisted that good will was the basic premise upon which values derive their authority. My question to Neale began with acts of violent cruelty such as the father who runs down his daughter because she is becoming to Westernized. His reply suggested that this was okay for what else could you expect from someone who had been raised to believe this was okay since they were three years of age. Well for me, and for Kant and a whole host of others, there is nothing kindly, nothing remotely similar to "good will" in an act of this nature. This is purely selfish lower animal behavior, like that of the stallion that kills the foal so it can get to the mare. Where is the enlightened consciousness in this?

I enjoyed a conversation Sunday with two men I admire. Neurosurgeon John L. Turner and NASA physicist, Tom Campbell joined me for an hour on the phone. Our conversation was all about consciousness. We agreed that everything is consciousness dealing with a data stream as in a multi-player virtual game. Our adapting laws of physics constitute the rule set for the game. We make changes in our individual realities by how we interpret this data stream and as a result of our interactions with others in our interpretations. So in this model, it is our relationships and our mutual interpretations that reinforce the world as we know it. Now, leaving it there for just a minute, what is one to do when, in the nature of their interaction with others, two opposing views arise. Simple--they discuss those views in an adult manner hoping to gain from the exchange and not as a result of subtracting from the other. To that point then, Neale and I disagreed and had a civil discussion about that disagreement. I asserted that the world would never know peace if we couldn't come to some point where there were common virtues (common values) that we could then put the rule of law behind. In my opinion, that might begin by deciding that life was sacred. In this great country we think of it all through the eyes of our founding fathers, "Created with certain inalienable rights--life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Neale's answer went along the lines that this is exactly what happens when 50% plus 1 agree.

We live in a so-called modern era where tradition is often discarded. In this culturally relevant modernism, there exists little coherence in values or ethics. There are those who say something along the lines of that suggested by Neale when he said, "Eldon, you expect people to consistent and they're not." He's right, I want coherence, consonance--not dissonance. The philosopher Alasdair Chalmers MacIntyre believes that a historical narration of the development of ethics is in order to illuminate the modern problem of moral arguments that proceed from incompatible premises. In his seminal work, AFTER VIRTUE, he identifies the central question of morality as having to do with the habits and knowledge concerning how to live a good life. His approach seeks to demonstrate that good judgment emanates from good character.

Again, many listeners wrote letters. One such listener wrote, "Excellent show this week with Mr. Walsch. First of all, you had an excellent guest who was compelling to listen to. A man of great intellect and wisdom. Secondly, it was more of a debate where you were both arguing and defending positions; ringside stuff, close encounters, blow by blow and you were endeavoring to find an opening to land an uppercut. Very stimulating radio indeed."

Another listener wrote, "I loved your interview with Neale Donald Walsch. I think you touched upon a really important subject, especially for those of us working on our spiritual growth. Although I respect much of Neale's work, I cannot agree with his statement about truth being determined by 51% of the people. Great crimes against humanity have been committed by groups in the majority, ranging from the holocaust to Rwanda. I believe that there are basic truths and moral values that, while hard to define sometimes, can be agreed upon by everyone. We all know that cruelty is wrong and man has an innate need to be free. I believe it is incumbent on all of us to thrash these questions out and get to a stage where there are basic values that we can all agree upon. It is only by doing this that our world can experience true peace."

I do also believe that peace, like freedom, is not free. That is not to say that violence is the answer for it may well not be. Mohandas Gandhi (also known as Mahatma--a title or distinction in Sanskrit that means "great one") Nelson Mandela, and Martin Luther King, to name but three, have demonstrated to all that principles can rise above force and liberty can be achieved without violence. Still, to bring this about requires what Gandhi called, "Right action." Two words that basically sum up my position on this. The first is "right." That presupposes that there is a lesser or "wrong" action. And then of course, the word, "action." We see more than enough in the news about those who stand by and do nothing while someone is brutalized or taken advantage of. Don't just stand by--get involved!

My office has sent a formal invitation to Mr. Walsch inviting him to come back and discuss all of this and hopefully he will accept. He did tell me over the phone at the conclusion of the show that he would love to--so perhaps then we can really flesh this all out and find some common ground. You will want to listen to this show when and if it happens.

I remember reading Baird Spalding's "Life and Teachings of the Masters of the Far East" years ago. In this multi volume set, the masters address America. Essentially they describe it as a great experiment that is the lighthouse to the world. A country unafraid of its spiritual heritage and undivided by its religious differences. A country where freedom rings, a country governed by laws designed to treat the least among them exactly as the most powerful, a country of hope and vision and opportunity. Again--a lighthouse to the world. In my view, our individual willingness to step up and address injustice, inequities and the like, speaks directly to the stage of our conscious evolution--an evolution toward enlightenment; or away from it. I do believe in the human potential so I like to think that many matters are written in the heart and just as a leaf turns toward the sun, our destiny is to turn toward the light--that is the light of enlightenment.

Thanks for the read,

Eldon

P. S. If you still haven't obtained a copy of Mind Programming, use this link to get your copy plus hundreds of f r e e bonus tools: http://www.progressiveawarenesspromotions.com/innertalk/May09/index.htm

 
More Articles...
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 Next > End >>

Page 3 of 4
SEO by Artio